Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (and ASQ-Social-Emotional)

  • Research Project Team

    Leading team:

    • Miranda Wolpert (CPRU Mental Health Lead)
    • Julian Edbrooke-Childs (Senior Research Fellow)
    • Jessica Deighton (CPRU Senior Research Fellow)


    • Tjasa Velikonja (CPRU Systematic Reviewer)
    • Michelle Sleed (Senior Research Psychologist)


    • Anna Brown, University of Kent (an expert in psychometrics)
    • Helen Bedford (CPRU) (expertise around the information gathered to date relating to ASQ)
    • CPRU colleagues (Catherine Law, Helen Roberts, Ruth Gilbert)
    • colleagues from existing networks (Steve Pilling, UCL, and Jane Barlow, University of Warwick)


  • Background

    Department of Health (DH) have requested a review to appraise the evidence of the reliability and validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3rd edition) and ASQ: Social Emotional (ASQ:SE) as a population outcome indicator for child development at age 2.5.

    DH has an objective to have an outcome indicator in place for child development at age 2.5 by 2015. In October 2013, a decision was taken by the DH Programme Management Group (PMG) to select ASQ as the preferred tool. ASQ was developed in the USA and has been adapted and validated for use in some other countries, but not yet in England.

    Our main research questions are:

    1. What is the evidence for the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the ASQ and ASQ-SE?
    2. What is the evidence for the validity of the norms and associated cut-offs for the ASQ and ASQ-SE?
    3. What is the evidence for measurement invariance across different countries and cultural contexts?
  • Aims

    • Examine studies published worldwide relating to the Ages and Stages Questionnaire and ASQ-Social-Emotional,
    • Seek to draw conclusions for the English context,
    • Provide some indication of the generalisability of other countries’ results to proposed use in England,
    • Provide further recommendations about the future use of ASQ and ASQ-SE.
  • Methodology

    Systematic Review

    The search was conducted in the following eight databases: PsycInfo, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, HaPI (Health and Psychosocial Instruments), ERIC, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL Plus, where two sets of search terms were used.

    In addition to the review process involving published scientific literature, the ‘grey’ literature was considered (e.g. conference abstracts, unpublished data).

Our use of cookies

We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We’d also like to set optional analytics to help us improve it. We won’t set optional cookies unless you enable them. Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences.

For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookies page

Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytics cookies

We’d like to set non-essential cookies, such as Google Analytics, to help us to improve our website by collecting and reporting information on how you use it. The cookies collect information in a way that does not directly identify anyone. For more information on how these cookies work, please see our Cookies page. If you are 16 or under, please ask a parent or carer for consent before accepting.